Kerr Street Artspace, Auckland, 8pm 11 April 2014
featuring works by Glen Downie, Nelson Lam, Celeste Oram, Salina Fisher, Alex Wolken, Callum Blackmore, David Grahame and Reuben Jelleyman
performed by Sam Rich (percussion), Kenny Keppel (clarinets), Alex MacDonald (viola), David Framil Carpeno (accordion), Eric Scholes (bass), Peau Halapua (violin)
featuring works by Glen Downie, Nelson Lam, Celeste Oram, Salina Fisher, Alex Wolken, Callum Blackmore, David Grahame and Reuben Jelleyman
performed by Sam Rich (percussion), Kenny Keppel (clarinets), Alex MacDonald (viola), David Framil Carpeno (accordion), Eric Scholes (bass), Peau Halapua (violin)
conducted by Alex Taylor
artistic direction by Alex Taylor
artistic direction by Alex Taylor
review by Chris Holdaway
Alex Taylor’s Intrepid Music Project series of new music concerts has operated out
of Devonport’s Kerr St Artspace for some time now. He’s developed a rotating cast of preeminent
musicians, themselves intrepid enough to tangle with composers intent on creating
great music, often well beyond conventional experience—not always an easy task
in the world of the classically trained.
I understand the April 11 concert was something of a ‘fringe’ event to
the Composers’ Association of New Zealand conference running during the
weekend. It also happened to be the most
compelling show of contemporary music in my recent Auckland-based memory.
Every work was superlative in some aspect.
Each contributed to the concert waxing
in a way that was—in various combinations at varying times—both wonderfully
reckless and luminously crafted. And I
felt like there was a lot of music on
this particular evening. One had only to
walk into the hall—perched on the side of Mount Victoria with its open
rafters—to get an oozing sense of laboratory madness from the plethora of
instruments lurking in all corners. Like
stumbling upon a weapons cache, which, with the North Head fortress just up the
road, didn’t necessarily seem all that implausible. Destruction ne’er too far from creation &
all that.
8 works were programmed, for the most
part occupying that ‘sweet spot’ of 5 to 10 minutes. As a poet, this has always seemed to me a
tough parameter of necessity for such outings.
We generally understand music as a broadly temporal art, one not
necessarily as suited to aphoristic scales as text; one that takes time to
unfold and work itself out. So writing
short music is hard; to not feel like it moves on too quickly, but still to
‘do’ something. The way I have found
myself thinking about a lot of the works in retrospect focuses on how they
operated in a locative sense, taking that time frame as setting up a particular
kind of space, Euclidean or non-Euclidean as the case may have been. The way their vectors traversed is often what
distinguished them for me in terms of scope.
This is true of Glen Downie’s Jive for Giuffre, which opened the
concert. Set up like a trio of the kind
that inspired it (clarinet, upright bass, drum kit), I was interested in how
the musicians navigated in a manner not immediately obvious, or familiar, to
such a system. Improvisation as an ideal
always hints at the group mind in terms of psychology; the ‘all-over’ in
aesthetics. Not that it has to be synonymous with
‘improvisation’, but a lot of jazz music is constructed around individualist
solos cutting through the web. You could
hear Glen’s musicians sitting back together like the Jimmy Giuffre 3 did in the
60s albums, to explore a more tempered, less abrasive mode of free jazz. I was most impressed by percussionist Sam
Rich, who, even when playing continuous figures in driving sections, never felt
like a ‘drummer’ at a kit laying down ‘riffs’.
The best moments saw the percussion suddenly suck the other two instruments
in underneath its dress, or spill like a liquid to occupy every crevice, but
there was enough trading & separation so that you really noticed this
happening.
I felt similarly about Alex Wolken’s quartet at the end of the first half,
which presented the curious assemblage of sharp-edged accordion amidst more
wholly mellow timbres (bass clarinet, electric bass, vibraphone). The accordion’s sound is always excessive;
endlessly on the verge of splintering into a thousand pieces. Yet there’s also a deep, almost geological,
drive in the background pulmonics. If it
seemed like the majority were working to take the edge off the accordion, to
strip it back to its base, the most captivating experiences were brief revolts
into the exact opposite, as if the vibraphone’s round tubes were replaced by
spears. Alex’s work was to me the most
hamstrung by its brevity. I really
wanted to see how he could work out the network of flood gates & canal
locks around the accordion in that instrumentation, and though what was
exhibited riveted me, I’m not sure he really got to do that.
Nelson Lam’s two short movements was in some ways one of the more conservative,
in terms of an abstract, string-heavy (violin, viola), identifiably
contemporary setup—no programme notes offered beyond I. spectra; II. recoil. But that being neither here nor there, the
formal conceit that cropped up for me was the most interesting of the night; a
question of timescales & relative perspective. Long drones of the 2 instruments shifting
over one another recalled for me similar figures frequently used by Steve Reich
(particularly in Eight Lines), but
isolated from any wider context. Then,
marked by more frantic passages, instead of temporal movement through a
sequence, I had a distinct feeling of being projected in and out to view
essentially the same structures from different ‘distances’. The
notes are this long only because that’s how close you are to them right now.
A similar duo setup existed for David
Grahame’s still life (clarinet, viola), and was probably the concert’s
most cohesive and stable piece. While
Nelson’s choice of individual notes came across as more complex, David’s work I
think offered more guts by remaining, not necessarily feeling forced or obliged
to go anywhere else. The form of slowly
offering successive tableaux of harmony may not be anything radical, but the
particular tensions in gaps between snapshots here were able to show, or at
least hint at, something beyond itself, without needing to explicitly tell of
it, appealing to this reviewer’s particular taste for music that doesn’t
require any great telos. It filled out
ideally into its own timeframe.
Celeste Oram’s eye music featured Sam Rich on percussion, alongside a video
projection of Ella Mae Lentz performing her American Sign Language (ASL) poem
of the same title. To be clear, this is
a poem native to ASL, not one that has been translated from a language of the
hearing. And so Celeste grapples with
how traditions of setting text to music may or may not cope under a new
strain. Sam begins away from his
percussion station, mallets in hand, playing the air, and obviously mirroring
some manual sign actions from the video.
The on-screen poem ends. He moves
into the percussion station. And it then
plays again, mallets this time meeting vibes & blocks instead of air. It was not until this point that I realised
the first section was not just miming playing in general, but miming the exact sequence
of actions to be performed on the instruments.
A third section sees musician play without accompanying video. Thanks to complexity of both underlying
concept & practical setup, this work was less seamless or polished than
most of the others, but that is in many ways what set it apart, and may in fact
have been crucial to its goal. The
silence during the opening mime sequence was a physical weight, like humid
air. You could feel Sam struggling, his movements incomplete, partially because
he’s a percussionist, not a dancer (that I know of), but more that he’s forced
to ‘speak’ without the apparatus that normally allows for ‘speech’. Struggling as the hearing struggle to relate
to the deaf, as the deaf struggle to simply live in a world that refuses to be
built for them.
Interval was chased up by Callum
Blackmore’s dramatic Unsavoury Liaisons,
an homage to Stockhausen’s Licht
opera cycle, reportedly swapping the “divine exchanges” of angels for the
“mundane interactions” of the everyday.
Filing back into seats, the hall becomes suddenly set ‘in-the-round’,
but ensemble rather than audience are at the periphery: percussion in front,
accordion right, clarinet behind, conductor left. Hemmed in, the audience is subject to an
onslaught on all fronts, most noticeably from the conductor’s threateningly
frantic gestures, & an accordion that seemed to conceal the power of a full
orchestral string section. Initially it
feels like the composer’s theatrical scrutiny is on the audience, as the
musicians do seem to just ‘play’ through the first Invocation section, and I can’t help but watch for those who try to
defend themselves out of discomfort. That
is until the respective ‘solos’, where antics from opposing stations threaten
to entirely derail focus. For Accordion Solo, clarinet downs instrument
to manically jump up, down, yell, spray deodorant on himself. First, there’s the pressure of a terrified
vanity in vulgar scented Lynx™, but also likely an obsessive hypochondria, especially
in the viable parity with bug spray. And
so the two complexes become one another.
During Percussion Solo, accordion
cackles apocalyptically, shredding newspaper over the instrument’s frame. In Clarinet
Solo, percussion first slices up a carrot, before choking on a bite of
apple. Coming to, he jumps in circles on
the spot, feverishly counting, as if that’s what it takes to recover from the
apple, or to escape from the nightmare.
All the while clarinet tries to noodle on. It was completely wild, completely
wonderful. If I have one criticism, it
is that the newspaper & carrot actions as actions as such were a bit
‘easy’; a bit Hmm, domestic…Oh! I know! However, the absorption of these
archetypes—complete with colander percussion—into a structure labelled by
contextually absurd “invocation”, “tutti”, “coda”, produced a chiasmic
projection of the crisis of the everyday as the crisis of existence, and the
crisis of existence playing out every day.
I wouldn’t say he completely dispensed with the angels, however. The Coda,
with its delicate bow on bells, & empty accordion breath, gives the
impression of suddenly looking upon the same scene from a vast, cosmic
distance. As if Mars were watching the
battle.
The night’s final slot was taken by
Reuben Jellyman’s pair of In Nomine à 5
II (violin, viola, clarinet, accordion, double bass, percussion), a
reworking for six musicians of Nicholas Strogers’ original for five, and In Nomine, Gloria Tibi Spiritus (same
except bass clarinet)—the most intellectual exercises of the evening. The first piece reconfigures the 16th
Century counterpoint towards having more requisite parts than available
musicians, demanding increasing sideways mobility from players as it develops. The steady pulse familiar to polyphonic music
from that era remains, but shifting layers & timbres, as instruments
manoeuvre into other pockets of the counterpoint, significantly dislocate the
music from its time, into the uncanny space where something long-familiar now
seems newly odd. The second piece was of
the composer’s own devising, driving the same In Nomine tradition towards a
more explicitly contemporary end. Extended
techniques on the strings, & dry breath from the accordion & clarinet
make sure of this. In retrospect I find
myself leaning towards the first, where the mismatch between deep source &
actual realisation was more subtle; where you could only just feel things
starting to change, rather than existing in a more stable zone already
well-altered and becoming geologically solidified. The accordion is an intriguingly odd timbre
for music of that texture, and once again Sam Rich was heroic on percussion,
his station allowing him to be fully immersed in the counterpoint, not just
with the coded pitches on his vibes, but the complete array of his weaponry.
It should be apparent by now, but while all
performers were outstanding, Sam Rich deserves a gallantry award for his
efforts. He featured in all but 2
pieces, and was made to leap through fiery dramatic hoops far beyond the job
description. But don’t think that this
could do anything to diminish the inspiration of his ‘regular’ playing; an
artistry of utilising different mallet weights & bows to have the
vibraphone fully articulate variously suspended waterfalls of sound, perhaps mostly
notably in Salina Fisher’s meditative painting Komorebi, a singular Japanese term that translates into English as
something akin to ‘light that filters through trees’. As a matter of personal taste, I have never
been one to easily accept such uncomplicatedly sweet mediation of ‘beauty’ in
nature; to expose only a very narrow view—a vein of naivety that is too easily
weak… I am interested in the grace of a
system insofar as that is not the sole property of said system. However, the programme notes state the piece
as a response to the word. So perhaps there is reason to argue that the
extension is not at play here, rather, we explore a more heavenly realm of
purely intensional semantics. The
constancy of high frequencies, & fullness of the vibe tone certainly could
serve to abstract.
With its balance of wilderness &
polish, & just the general tone of setup & proceedings, this concert
confirmed emphatically the Intrepid Music Project’s cardinal place more than
any other event in the series that I have been to (and I think I’ve been to all
of them). Musicians, composers, &
convener are all to be commended. Let’s
do it again sometime.
No comments:
Post a Comment